Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ursa mini 4.6k Shots from Robbie Fatt (looks really good)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ursa mini 4.6k Shots from Robbie Fatt (looks really good)

    When this camera works well it really is something to behold. The colours in this is just insane. And he said it's his first time grading and editing in Resolve. Feels like a legit romantic comedy.



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jCEYEVYmsQ

    something weird happens at 2.28 ...like corrupt files or something.
    Last edited by jambredz; 04-28-2016, 06:15 PM.
    Darren Scott
    Freelance Director/Director of Photography


    https://vimeo.com/jambredzvisions/videos

  • #2
    Tat 24-105 man... repeatedly. Such a great lens. I'm wondering if it's because you shoot wide open with it at all times, and the bokeh's just so perfect.

    SKYPE (best way to talk to me): Camera_Kholi | twitter
    Avery and Pete: Superseeds Feature Film Trailer

    Comment


    • #3
      He said the glitch at the end was during the render... "GPU memory full issue during export".
      Darren Scott
      Freelance Director/Director of Photography


      https://vimeo.com/jambredzvisions/videos

      Comment


      • #4
        That's what happens when your computer can't handle 4.6K RAW xD

        SKYPE (best way to talk to me): Camera_Kholi | twitter
        Avery and Pete: Superseeds Feature Film Trailer

        Comment


        • #5
          Interestingly I have had a lot of people complain about the bokeh in this video. I did shoot wide open and ND'd down with a Hoya IR Cut.

          Also, do u know of a Mac model I can get that will handle the raw files?? Haha.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by robbiefatt View Post
            Also, do u know of a Mac model I can get that will handle the raw files?? Haha.
            What Mac are you using?

            Comment


            • #7
              At the moment I'm just using one from work with these specs:
              Mac Pro (Mid 2012)
              2 x 2.4 GHz 6 Core Intel Xeon
              16 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 ECC
              ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB

              But I plan on just buying a new one for personal use. Can the new iMac process 4.6k raw footage in real time?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by robbiefatt View Post
                At the moment I'm just using one from work with these specs:
                Mac Pro (Mid 2012)
                2 x 2.4 GHz 6 Core Intel Xeon
                16 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 ECC
                ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB

                But I plan on just buying a new one for personal use. Can the new iMac process 4.6k raw footage in real time?
                If you put a newer GPU in that 2012 Mac Pro like a GTX 970 or 980 or Titan it would work way better. But I think even the top specced iMac would struggle with 4.6k raw. Rick Lang here on the forum has one but he mainly does HD deliveries. He says it works well with HD and can work on simple 4.6k stuff but can quickly get bogged down. Personally I'm going to try a out a top-of-the-line iMac for a week just to try it, but I only really do HD stuff. I can't recommend buying a new Mac Pro at this time as it's almost 3 years old and I've been hearing some rumors of a refresh later this year (also new Macbook Pros can't come soon enough!).

                Comment

                Working...
                X