Thread: Soft edges with wide angle lenses on the BMP4K

Page 1 of 17 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 167
  1. #1 Soft edges with wide angle lenses on the BMP4K 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    153
    I'm getting some really soft edges with wide angle lenses on the BMP4K and was wondering if anyone experienced something similar. The lenses I've tried so far are native MFT lenses, the Laowa 7.5mm and the Samyang 12mm. I know the problem is not with the lenses because I use them on the GH5S and the GX85 without any soft edges. Another reason I don't think the problem is with the lens is that I can actually get the edges in focus at the expense of a softer center point. Here are some examples:


    BMP4K with Laowa 7.5mm at f/2 - Focus is set to center of frame.

    BMP4K with Laowa 7.5mm at f/2 - Focus is set to edges of frame.

    GX85 with Laowa 7.5mm at f/2 - Focus is set to center of frame.

    =====

    BMP4K with Samyang 12mm at f/2 - Focus is set to center of frame.

    BMP4K with Samyang 12mm at f/2 - Focus is set to edges of frame.

    GX85 with Samyang 12mm at f/2 - Focus is set to center of frame.

    Any idea why this is happening?
     

  2. #2  
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Near Dallas
    Posts
    78
    What about at f4 or f5.6 ?

    Lenses are usually not optimal at their full aperture especially at that price level.

    Another theory is that the Lumix cameras usually do in camera lens correction, especially so with their own lumix lenses. I would suspect it still does since you have to type in the focal length when you use third party manual lenses.

    I have the Laowa and I have good results with it with my GH4. I will test it when my P4k arrives.
    Last edited by ted ramasola; 10-13-2018 at 08:03 PM.
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    431
    The GH series can only correct the distortion of 1st party lenses with electronic contact. You enter the focal length of manual lenses for IBIS.
     

  4. #4  
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Near Dallas
    Posts
    78
    Quote Originally Posted by joe12south View Post
    The GH series can only correct the distortion of 1st party lenses with electronic contact. You enter the focal length of manual lenses for IBIS.
    I think this is correct, so its probably due to having it at full open then. Though I think I havent seen it THAT soft when I used it at f2. Hhmm..
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by joe12south
    The GH series can only correct the distortion of 1st party lenses with electronic contact. You enter the focal length of manual lenses for IBIS.
    That's my understanding as well. The lenses that I'm using are 3rd party lenses and they don't have any electronic contacts to communicate with the camera, so there shouldn't be any corrections at all.

    Quote Originally Posted by ted ramasola View Post
    I think this is correct, so its probably due to having it at full open then. Though I think I havent seen it THAT soft when I used it at f2. Hhmm..
    I understand that shooting wide open tends to be softer especially for wider lenses, but the focus is perfectly fine when I use those same lenses on my GX85. What's even more weird is that the focal plane isn't even all the way across the frame....makes me think this has something to do with the BMP4K's sensor stack being different from standard MTF cameras. Another reason that leads me to believe that is the "infinity" mark on my lenses are off quite a bit when shooting on the BMP4K compared to my GX85.
     

  6. #6  
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Near Dallas
    Posts
    78
    Since I happen to have the same GX85 that you have I decided to do a chart test and true enough, at f2 the loawa has soft on on the edges, I noticed that on the left side it is softer than on the right, its a quick and dirty test, and since its wide, I'm very close to the chart so any slight off centering of my camera will probably impact focus across the chart. But yeah soft on the side.
    At F4 it negligible.
    f2
    f2.jpg

    f4
    f4.jpg

    and since the p4k has no digital sharpening like in the lumix cameras, these slightly off focus lenses will be obvious.
    Last edited by ted ramasola; 10-13-2018 at 11:38 PM.
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by ted ramasola View Post
    Since I happen to have the same GX85 that you have I decided to do a chart test and true enough, at f2 the loawa has soft on on the edges, I noticed that on the left side it is softer than on the right, its a quick and dirty test, and since its wide, I'm very close to the chart so any slight off centering will probably impact focus across the chart. But yeah soft on the sides.
    At F4 it negligible.
    f2
    f2.jpg

    f4
    f4.jpg

    and since the p4k has no digital sharpening like in the lumix cameras, these slightly off focus lenses will be obvious.
    Thanks for taking the time to take those test shots. Did you take both of those with the GX85? Do you have a BMP4K that you can shoot the same thing and compare?

    I'm trying to isolate the softness from the lens versus softness from the camera. Since both my Laowa 7.5mm and Samyang 12mm can focus at f/2 evenly across the frame on my GX85, it should also be able to do the same thing with the BMP4K. I don't think it has to do with digital sharpening either, since I can get the edges to focus on the BMP4K at the expense of center sharpness (I've posted examples of this in my first post as well). It's just odd to me that I can't get these lenses to focus evenly across the frame on the BMP4K, but they work perfectly fine on my GX85.
     

  8. #8  
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Near Dallas
    Posts
    78
    Yes, both with GX85. I have a bigger chart which I use to test my wide lenses years back but I already rolled it into storage, this was on the shelf in my office so I just took it out since this Laowa was relatively new to me and I didnt "properly" test it.

    Anyhow, my pocket has not yet arrived but this was also something of a revelation for this lens that, its not evenly sharp AND not evenly soft! I'd attribute it probably to QC in manufacture. If I were you and I want to isolate the issue, I'd test it with a control lens, something thats "industry proven" to be good. If you have a lumix 12-35, I'd use that as its a sharp lens across the frame. I would not use that samyang as basis, though their 35mm f1.4 is good, just not at f1.4, stop it down to 2 or 2.8 and its good.
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member Samuel H's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    632
    Cameras have a chunk of flat glass in front of the sensor, and the thickness of that glass affects how the image hits the sensor. Lenses are designed for a specific glass cover thickness, and if the sensor has a different thickness then they will become soft, with this being more of an issue for, you guessed it, wide lenses with fast aperture.

    With the original 2.5k camera, BM used thinner glass than other m43 manufacturers, because it used canon-like thickness. I would guess they would go thick on the p4k, but maybe they didn't?

    https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/201...oes-it-matter/
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by Samuel H View Post
    Cameras have a chunk of flat glass in front of the sensor, and the thickness of that glass affects how the image hits the sensor. Lenses are designed for a specific glass cover thickness, and if the sensor has a different thickness then they will become soft, with this being more of an issue for, you guessed it, wide lenses with fast aperture.

    With the original 2.5k camera, BM used thinner glass than other m43 manufacturers, because it used canon-like thickness. I would guess they would go thick on the p4k, but maybe they didn't?

    https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/201...oes-it-matter/
    That's what I assumed but I couldn't find where the actual sensor stack thickness is mentioned for the BMP4K. I remember having issues with the thinner sensor stack with my original BMPCC as well, although that was sorta fixed when I added the Mosaic OLPF. From my brief experience in shooting with it so far, it seems like the sensor is already really good at suppressing aliasing and IR pollution so I don't think a 3rd party OLPF will be created. I wonder how this problem could be solved then...
     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-21-2016, 12:57 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-31-2014, 04:44 PM
  3. Adapters and Wide Angle Lenses
    By Vanguard in forum Lens Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-16-2014, 07:58 AM
  4. Wide Angle
    By Nick Bennett in forum Lens Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-21-2013, 05:49 PM
  5. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-04-2012, 01:37 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •