Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New mac Pro Out in December; Starts at 2.999 USD

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by tefliux View Post

    Again the noise is 12db and the cooling system ensure a 100% usage of the GPU cards.
    Reality check #1

    Actually the GPU cards are clocked down, so the cooling system and the weak power supply don't have a core melt.

    Originally posted by mico View Post
    Its a beast, has proven to be a beast, and will knock significant time off your workflow this new Mac Pro. Thats worth the cost of the beast. YAAAAHOO.
    Reality check #2

    Though an old MacPro with two cheap (way under 300 bucks each) AMD Radeon R9 280X is still faster than "the beast".

    http://coloristos.podomatic.com/entr...11_55_53-08_00
    Blog: http://frankglencairn.wordpress.com/

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Frank Glencairn View Post
      Reality check #2

      Though an old MacPro with two cheap (way under 300 bucks each) AMD Radeon R9 280X is still faster than "the beast".

      http://coloristos.podomatic.com/entr...11_55_53-08_00
      But we all that as time goes by this will all be moot.

      We all went through the same iteration from PowerPC to Intel and from chip to chip.

      Its all about progress.

      Whats new now will be better later but then something else will come and we will all be doing these tests again.

      I embrace it every time

      Comment


      • So, slower as the old machine is "progress" now?

        And yeah, in a year we gonna see a new NewMacPro and everything will be better.
        Maybe the will add back some PCI solts and exchangeable GPUs than.
        Blog: http://frankglencairn.wordpress.com/

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Frank Glencairn View Post
          Just happened: http://liftgammagain.com/forum/index...-vs-2010.2256/

          As I said, the R9 280x are faster in all disciplines, except when it comes to CPU number crunching - than a new 12 core is faster than an old one, which is to be expected.
          Very detailed investigation. It's a pity they didn't include something like the workstation you detailed. It seems it would smoke every MacPro version, even the much more expensive one.
          If a Resolve project can keep all the configurations constant across systems, I still think it would be a good idea to do something like this. In my case, since I'm not a Resolve user and I'm not going to buy a Mac anyway, just for the fun
          My YouTube channel

          Comment


          • "Hi,

            I think this new MacPro is amazing and those 2 GPUs are incredibly powerful. I am not sure what I can say however there is a whole new OpenCL and DaVinci Resolve 10 is having lots of performance work done to integrate it and its really really fast. Those GPUs are very high performance and each GPU has lots of graphics memory so this is the Mac we have been waiting for! We have lots of Thunderbolt products too so video in and out is taken care of.

            We will have more details once the engineering guys get back from WWDC and we know more.

            Overall we could not be happier!

            Regards,

            Grant Petty
            Blackmagic Design "



            A beast YAAAAHOOOOO

            Comment


            • Originally posted by tefliux View Post
              There is no war between mac or pc... this is just two different products. The hardware is not everything, you need also to have good software well developed.

              Anyway, following some test with the new mac pro, a 8 cores, done by yakyakyak.fr, Davinci Resolve support more than 25 nodes with 4K 4444 prores files and still playing 24 frames per second . R3D files need the de-bayering set to quarter of quality but the number of node is not really impacted.

              .
              Hmmm- I can't get single ProRes 444 4K to play at 25fps in Resolve 10 (6 cores MAC PRO) on 4K screen.
              I'm not sure why everyone is so excited about 12 cores. MAC PRO Xeons are nothing special- standard Intel Xeons and only 1 CPU is posstible. It's already outdated compared to PC/Linux possibilities (you can have 96 cores if needed). The worse Apple decision was to use ATI cards- way, way more software works with Nvidia (CUDA), but of course Apple does not care about it

              Fact that 6 Thunderbolt2 ports share only 3 Thunderbolt buses is also very disappointing. If you want to work with 4K you actually run out of bandwidth quite quickly.
              I like form factor and it looks lovely, but only until you connect your external devices, than it very quickly became a small mess.
              Last edited by Andrew_HD; 01-23-2014, 07:49 AM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Andrew_HD View Post
                Hmmm- I can't get single ProRes 444 4K to play at 25fps in Resolve 10 (6 cores MAC PRO) on 4K screen.
                I'm not sure why everyone is so excited about 12 cores. MAC PRO Xeons are nothing special- standard Intel Xeons and only 1 CPU is posstible. It's already outdated compared to PC/Linux possibilities (you can have 96 cores if needed). The worse Apple decision was to use ATI cards- way, way more software works with Nvidia (CUDA), but of course Apple does not care about it

                Fact that 6 Thunderbolt2 ports share only 3 Thunderbolt buses is also very disappointing. If you want to work with 4K you actually run out of bandwidth quite quickly.
                I like form factor and it looks lovely, but only until you connect your external devices, than it very quickly became a small mess.
                They are doing a presentation on the video and it works. Davinci 10 is working fine with AMD cards.

                What is your bottle neck ?

                We need more feedback and good success story about thunderbolt 2. The technology is really new and we cannot trust it based on the performance on the paper. But this is a good innovation and I'am really interested about the new 100 meters TB cable.
                Apple ][ for ever

                Comment


                • I'm curious how the most basic version new Mac pro runs with davinci 10. Thinking of getting a new mac.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by tefliux View Post
                    They are doing a presentation on the video and it works. Davinci 10 is working fine with AMD cards.

                    What is your bottle neck ?

                    We need more feedback and good success story about thunderbolt 2. The technology is really new and we cannot trust it based on the performance on the paper. But this is a good innovation and I'am really interested about the new 100 meters TB cable.
                    Well- they run it in the video I run it next to my eyes DPX 4K was fine, ProRes stuttered. Maybe 10.1 will make difference.
                    Do they run it on 4K monitor? I'm not saying that there is no power in MAC PRO and Resolve, but there are still many issues. Resolve 10 seams to be far from being rock solid (well Resolve never was rock solid on MAC).
                    I will try again later. One thing which I can confirm is SSD- nice and fast, around 900MB/sec read.

                    What do you want to know about Thunderbolt2?
                    6 ports, but on 3 controllers, so you have 20Gbit shared between 2 ports. This is the reason why MAC PRO can drive "only" 3x 4K screens (not eg. 6). 4K at 60Hz is about 16Gbit/sec so it almost saturates Thunderbolt2 connection.

                    This bit is unclear and very confusing, so I don't guarantee it's 100% accurate:

                    This:

                    http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/384157/t...-to-20gbit-sec

                    http://www.anandtech.com/show/7618/l...-2-mini-review

                    is not what Intel was promising:

                    http://blogs.intel.com/technology/20...fer-display-2/

                    TB1 has 2 separate channels- data and display port, so 10Gbit+10Gbit. They are independent and can't be joined, but offer 20Gbit total bandwidth.
                    Looks like (even if this is against info on Intel site) TB2 joins these 2 channels creating 1x 20Gbit, but this means that bandwidth is shared between display port and data, so once you have 4K screen connected, not much more bandwidth is left for data.

                    Answer maybe that Apple is "lazy" and not implementing TB2 "properly" in their devices.
                    Another "issue" is that TB2 is still on PCI-E gen2 x4 bus internally, so this is at most 2GB/sec.



                    Real data bandwidth is at least at 1.5GB/sec (probably more, update- Intel does say 1.5GB/sec in real life). I will be cheeking this soon with Sanlink2 attached to very fast RAID. This should be around 1.5GB/sec (at leas on fibre channel side), so this will prove if TB2 can also pass it. I will try adding 4K screen through daisy chaining and see what happens. This should give an answer (but some tests already proved that it's just 20Gbit in total).
                    Another question- if TB2 can drive 4K screen at 60Hz than it should be able to deliver 2.0GB/sec, but looks like when used for sending data it's rather limited to 1.5GB/sec- strange.
                    Last edited by Andrew_HD; 01-24-2014, 07:39 AM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Andrew_HD View Post
                      Another "issue" is that TB2 is still on PCI-E x4 bus internally, so this is at most 2GB/sec.


                      Real data bandwidth is at least at 1.5GB/sec (probably more). I will be cheeking this soon with Sanlink2 attached to very fast RAID. This should be around 1.5GB/sec (at leas on fibre channel side), so this will prove if TB2 can also pass it.
                      Is it PCI-E x4 v3 ? on the last motherboard.
                      Apple ][ for ever

                      Comment


                      • Forgotten to add - no, apparently is still v2.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Andrew_HD View Post
                          What do you want to know about Thunderbolt2?
                          6 ports, but on 3 controllers, so you have 20Gbit shared between 2 ports. This is the reason why MAC PRO can drive "only" 3x 4K screens (not eg. 6). 4K at 60Hz is about 16Gbit/sec so it almost saturates Thunderbolt2 connection.
                          HDMI is also on one of the TB controllers, reducing bandwidth even more.

                          1228-macprodisplay_ports-macprodisplay_ports.jpg
                          Blog: http://frankglencairn.wordpress.com/

                          Comment


                          • Yes- I left it unmentioned

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X