Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Angenieux 17.5-70mm with BMPCC

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Useg Diaz-Granados
    replied
    All this information is very insightful and useful to a novice like me.

    Thank you for clearing things up.


    Sincerely,

    Useg Diaz-Granados

    Leave a comment:


  • Amoore
    replied
    Thanks guys

    Originally posted by Joewi View Post
    Nice work. Did you add the vignetting effect in post or is that from the lens?
    Also, what did you use for stabilization?
    Any vignetting you see is from the lens and everything was shot on a monopod.

    Originally posted by Logan Gee View Post
    How much noise was there? Do you have any original frames?
    There wasn't much noise, but I had to push the exposure in post which introduced quite a bit.


    Originally posted by nickjbedford View Post
    Great look Alec. Little on the dark side in the grade perhaps, maybe half a stop brighter? I found myself squinting to see what was in the frame properly, that's all.

    I love FilmConvert. Ended up buying it with their 25% off discount right now. Which stock did you use?

    Great work for a test.
    Yes it is a little on the dark side. Especially inside the car. That's from me not being used to exposing with the BMPCC. Using just zebras is a little tough, would love some other exposure tools in camera. So I ended up underexposing more than I thought I was.
    It was pushed as high as I was comfortable with in post. And I used one of the Fuji stocks

    Originally posted by Tolin View Post
    What I'm rather sure Nick was talking about wasn't the contrast between light and dark (Which is what I got from your links) and the preference for darkness rather than light - But the fact that some shots just generally are dark. I think if he exposed more to the right he'd been able to salvage more detail in places such as the actor's face and hair etc.

    That said though I think it's a gorgeous video.
    Correct, Image is underexposed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tolin
    replied
    Originally posted by Useg Diaz-Granados View Post
    Nick, as a total beginner I think that the level of darkness is a personal preference.
    Here are some interesting links that sort of supports my viewpoint.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eobw_x_ky2k

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mas4zNdBhzo
    What I'm rather sure Nick was talking about wasn't the contrast between light and dark (Which is what I got from your links) and the preference for darkness rather than light - But the fact that some shots just generally are dark. I think if he exposed more to the right he'd been able to salvage more detail in places such as the actor's face and hair etc.

    That said though I think it's a gorgeous video.

    Leave a comment:


  • Useg Diaz-Granados
    replied
    Great look Alec. Little on the dark side in the grade perhaps, maybe half a stop brighter? I found myself squinting to see what was in the frame properly, that's all.
    Nick, as a total beginner I think that the level of darkness is a personal preference.

    Here are some interesting links that sort of supports my viewpoint.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eobw_x_ky2k

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mas4zNdBhzo


    Sincerely,

    Useg Diaz-Granados
    Last edited by Useg Diaz-Granados; 11-28-2013, 02:10 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joewi
    replied
    Nice work. Did you add the vignetting effect in post or is that from the lens?
    Also, what did you use for stabilization?

    Leave a comment:


  • nickjbedford
    replied
    Great look Alec. Little on the dark side in the grade perhaps, maybe half a stop brighter? I found myself squinting to see what was in the frame properly, that's all.

    I love FilmConvert. Ended up buying it with their 25% off discount right now. Which stock did you use?

    Great work for a test.

    Leave a comment:


  • Logan Gee
    replied
    How much noise was there? Do you have any original frames?

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcConaghy
    replied
    Nice work, Amoore! Really like that look.

    Leave a comment:


  • Amoore
    replied
    Originally posted by haavard View Post
    Looks nice, but it would have been nice to have a downloadable file, or at least a HD version on Vimeo
    It is HD on Vimeo?

    Made it downloadable for you. But the origonal file can't be downloaded as I don't have Vimeo plus.

    Sorry.

    Leave a comment:


  • haavard
    replied
    Looks nice, but it would have been nice to have a downloadable file, or at least a HD version on Vimeo

    Leave a comment:


  • Amoore
    replied
    Originally posted by Useg Diaz-Granados View Post
    Nice footage and nice lens for the Pocket!

    Hope you post some more.


    Sincerely,

    Useg Diaz-Granados
    Thanks Useg

    Leave a comment:


  • Useg Diaz-Granados
    replied
    Nice footage and nice lens for the Pocket!

    Hope you post some more.


    Sincerely,

    Useg Diaz-Granados

    Leave a comment:


  • Amoore
    started a topic Angenieux 17.5-70mm with BMPCC

    Angenieux 17.5-70mm with BMPCC

    https://vimeo.com/80294710

    First test with Black Magic Pocket Cinema Camera.

    Shot using an Angenieux 17.5-70mm 2.2 PL

    Graded with FIlmconvert

    Denoised with NeatVideo

    Sharpened in post
Working...
X